5/30/2023 0 Comments Rapidity speediness crossword![]() ![]() BFD Daily Opinion Poll 28 April, 2023 10:15 am.A Law Change to Protect Children 28 April, 2023 10:30 am.‘Voice’ Support Falls across the Board 28 April, 2023 11:30 am.View from Your Window 28 April, 2023 12:00 pm.The Climate Cult Is an Exclusive Club 28 April, 2023 1:00 pm.If the Science Is Settled Why Can’t They Answer Our Questions? 28 April, 2023 1:30 pm.‘Triple Whammy of Options’ 28 April, 2023 2:00 pm.What Is a Wahine? Maori Knew Perfectly Well 28 April, 2023 2:30 pm.Laughter Is the Best Medicine 28 April, 2023 3:00 pm.The BFD Stuff Up of the Day 28 April, 2023 3:30 pm.I Agree with Jacobin - Again! 28 April, 2023 4:00 pm.Top Ten Quotes from the NYT Fauci Interview 28 April, 2023 4:30 pm.So fast was its decline that the idea that it survived as an unseen, marginal species for nearly another century is highly implausible, to say the least. Hence, it collapsed into extinction with stunning rapidity. It’s likely that the Tasmanian population was living a marginal, last-gasp, existence. And that was on a far larger landmass with a greater variety of environmental niches to occupy. Indeed, thylacines had gone extinct on the Australian Mainland millennia earlier, likely wiped out by competitive pressure from the introduced dingo. The species was extinct within just months of the threat being realised and the species listed as protected. The speed of its decline caught everyone by surprise. Numbers plunged from an estimated 5,000 to likely extinction in just 133 years. The collapse of the thylacine population was notably rapid. “You could have entertained that hypothesis 10 or 15 years ago when there hadn’t been much scientific effort out there, but there has been now, and we still haven’t found any trace.” ABC Australia “But the thylacine was a large, wide-ranging predator and there have been enough cameras out there, especially over the last 10 years, to say it’s just not there. “It’s a wild, vast area, and there aren’t many people or much activity, that’s true. ![]() “I don’t think it is possible,” Professor Brook said. So is there even the remotest chance that Tasmanian tigers survive, to this day, in the state’s wild and rugged south-west? He might as well claimed to have seen the Loch Ness Monster.Īt least the study authors retain enough scientific probity to concede that the last-grasp hope so many enthusiasts cling to is highly unlikely. So, in the dark, middle of nowhere, in pouring rain and no camera. He reported that he observed a fully grown male thylacine for about a minute but did not have a camera, so there was no photo. Naarding was a park ranger at Togari, in Tasmania’s far north-west, who parked his car one night in the pouring rain at a remote crossroads. “There are some cases that seem, on the face of it, to be extremely plausible, like Hans Naarding from 1982.” Meaning: they’ll believe any old tall story. “If you take that hard approach to evidence, it comes to the unsurprising conclusion that they were probably gone by the early 1940s.”īut that wouldn’t excite headlines, would it? So, instead they chose to take “a more lenient definition of evidence”. “In terms of physical evidence, there’s formal modelling you can do from the last observed animal in the species that tells you how long you’d expect to wait ,” Professor Brook said. They even admit that a hard-nosed, evidence-based conclusion is that the thylacine went extinct exactly when it has always been thought: the late ’30s or early ’40s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |